On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 22:07:22 +1000 David Seikel <onef...@gmail.com> said:
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 12:27:12 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:46:32 +0900 Jérôme Pinot <ngc...@gmail.com> > > said: > > > > > > Then, the question of keeping/removing the comments. It's a > > > question of taste and does not matter much. I personnaly think > > > that's better to keep the comments, because it's what output > > > "doxygen -u", when you update the config file. So, it's easier to > > > maintain in the long term. Drawback is that it makes a big config > > > file. Vim can fold all the comments with: > > > > sure - just funny that you have lots of "spelling" changes to the > > comments. (adding .'s etc. :)) > > Comments are documentation to, for those looking at the source code. > It's just as important for them to be correct and easy to read. Not > everyone is an expert at reading rasteronian. Spell checking comments, > making them easier to read, is all good. That's one of the reasons why > I use a spell checker in my IDE. the day a config file is code... is the day i'm a monkeys uncle. :) its a config file. did u read the patch? VAL=x VAL2=y that's it. the comments are perfectly readable and its a corner of the build almost no one ever looks at or needs to. -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel