On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 12:27:12 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:46:32 +0900 Jérôme Pinot <ngc...@gmail.com> > said: > > > Then, the question of keeping/removing the comments. It's a > > question of taste and does not matter much. I personnaly think > > that's better to keep the comments, because it's what output > > "doxygen -u", when you update the config file. So, it's easier to > > maintain in the long term. Drawback is that it makes a big config > > file. Vim can fold all the comments with: > > sure - just funny that you have lots of "spelling" changes to the > comments. (adding .'s etc. :)) Comments are documentation to, for those looking at the source code. It's just as important for them to be correct and easy to read. Not everyone is an expert at reading rasteronian. Spell checking comments, making them easier to read, is all good. That's one of the reasons why I use a spell checker in my IDE. -- A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
