On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr> wrote:
> Hello, > > On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > <barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote: > > EFL single tree is almost ready, now just missing Ethumb and Emotion, > which > > should come easily and maybe I can finish them next week. > > I have been thinking that maybe we should be able to do elementary in > fact now. As we have to webkit/efl backend, maybe we can move that > code out to a module API and compile them outside of efl tree. It > would also help by reducing the size of the thing to load at start > time and defer it until the application use an elm_web one. > This one looks like a good hack. But I wonder how long it will take before we find another case like that. Problem is that EFL is meant to be lean... and Elementary to be a very high-level umbrella, it is expected to have stuff in its dependencies that will be outside of EFL, maybe they are big as webkit. with Eo we could move elm_web as a widget outside of elementary, people would have to pkg-config elementary-web. I'd be more in favor of this than the other way around. > I need your help to review the warnings and remove them. Some libraries > > didn't use to build with all warnings on, and now they do. Some are bit > > annoying but can be fixed easily such as "parameter not used". Some need > > more care in order to avoid breakages during the fixes (shadow warnings, > if > > you rename the inner variable and forget to replace every place, you'll > get > > rid of the warning but will have a bug! be careful!) > > Good point, we should kill this warning. I guess I will not be able to > help you during this week, but maybe next week. At least I will put > that on my todo. > > > Also tests were forced into distcheck as they should be. But we need to > fix > > tests in multiple fronts: > > - make them pass (some evas tests are not passing!) > > - make them silent (some tests wisely trigger error conditions, causing > > EINA_SAFETY or ENA_MAGIC or EINA_LOG to kick in and be loud. In these > cases > > we must replace eina_log print callback and check if the error was > issued, > > failing if not, hiding the message if it pass) > > Same here. > > > Eina used to do that for all tests, but now we have some for binshare and > > the eina magic, simple xml and eina value timeval are wrong. The eina > > timeval test is also bad, because it doesn't use CHECK's string > comparison > > test and the error message is quite useless: strcmp(str, "...") == 0. > where > > it could print both strings. > > What is the current score of eina and eet coverage ratio ? I remember > that we are lacking a lot of test there, but maybe it did evolve in > the past months since I last checked. > are you crazy? did you ever see coverage ration improving out of nowhere? I bet it decreased :-( -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: barbi...@gmail.com Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
