On 01/05/13 10:58, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Wed, 01 May 2013 10:08:48 +0100 Tom Hacohen <tom.haco...@samsung.com> said: > >> On 30/04/13 18:48, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >>> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:15:05 +0100 Tom Hacohen <tom.haco...@samsung.com> >>> said: >>> >>>> Where did you get that on? >>>> Anyhow, what do you think about changing it to unsigned wchar_t? >>> >>> on my pentium-m test machine... unicode val 0 was < 0 and thus walked below >>> the array. yes. literally a negative. wouldnt that be wuchar_t or >>> something? as wchar_t .. is a typedef... :) >>> >> >> Hm... Annoying. There's no wuchar_t though. > > then we have... a problem... and it requires we check for < 0. :( > >
I think me might be better off casting to unsigned. Damn you people for not doing all the char type unsigned, wth?! -- Tom. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost. Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with <2% overhead Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
