On Wed, 01 May 2013 11:00:01 +0100 Tom Hacohen <tom.haco...@samsung.com> said:
> On 01/05/13 10:58, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > On Wed, 01 May 2013 10:08:48 +0100 Tom Hacohen <tom.haco...@samsung.com> > > said: > > > >> On 30/04/13 18:48, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > >>> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:15:05 +0100 Tom Hacohen <tom.haco...@samsung.com> > >>> said: > >>> > >>>> Where did you get that on? > >>>> Anyhow, what do you think about changing it to unsigned wchar_t? > >>> > >>> on my pentium-m test machine... unicode val 0 was < 0 and thus walked > >>> below the array. yes. literally a negative. wouldnt that be wuchar_t or > >>> something? as wchar_t .. is a typedef... :) > >>> > >> > >> Hm... Annoying. There's no wuchar_t though. > > > > then we have... a problem... and it requires we check for < 0. :( > > > > > > I think me might be better off casting to unsigned. Damn you people for > not doing all the char type unsigned, wth?! chances are the compiler will produce the exact same code regardless... a cast or what is there now. -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost. Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with <2% overhead Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
