On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 10:21:35 +0100 Tom Hacohen <tom.haco...@samsung.com> wrote:
> On 17/09/13 08:30, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > > Hello. > > > > On 09/17/2013 07:44 AM, Chris Michael - Enlightenment Git wrote: > >> devilhorns pushed a commit to branch master. > >> > >> commit 64bc97c53c5c3772595f9d2321f9e19590d8a477 > >> Author: Chris Michael <cp.mich...@samsung.com> > >> Date: Mon Sep 16 11:40:30 2013 +0100 > >> > >> Remove __UNUSED__ from function declaration where parameter > >> is actually used. > > > > This brings an old topic back into my mind. > > > > Its not the first time we eagerly tagged parameters as unused > > because gcc warned about it and later started to use them without > > removing the unused label. This has the potential to screw us badly > > as it is up to the compiler to decide what to do with the parameter > > here. > > I don't know much about the exact implementation details of GCC, but > I find it very unlikely that GCC is allowed, or will ever actually do > anything about a *used* variable that is marked as unused. That just > sounds too crazy to be true. So I don't think we'll ever get screwed. Lots of things gcc does are too crazy to be true. Just ask Rob Landley to get an ear full. -- A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99! 1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
