2014-08-17 1:24 GMT-03:00 Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com>: > compile-time for efl itself. you have to build it without checking. i'd > advise > against it because efll uses its own objects internally and if efl has a > mistake in it you just nuked efl's own internal safety. i highly suggest > not > doing this. > > it may be that we remove the ability to compile without this check in the > end > as i an just see it now. gentoo ricers are going to add a use flag to turn > this > off and then we will get tonnes of stability complaints because the rest > of us > normal people run without turning the safety off. > > it's worth keeping this safety on. it doesn't cost much and is totally > worth > it. >
I'd like to see this checking disabled per call only, not globally. Then only bindings for safe languages would use it. I'll leave the safety checks turned on. They're worth. Also, EFL is for GUI only and heavy computing sensitive data can be implemented without negative impact by just not touching EFL (temporally). Once more, good work. -- Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira https://about.me/vinipsmaker ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
