Very nice!! :D

On 9/8/14, Tom Hacohen <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 08/09/14 14:50, Daniel Zaoui wrote:
>> ReHi,
>>
>> On 09/08/14 16:42, Daniel Zaoui wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 09/08/14 16:16, Jean Rene Dawin wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 02:36:10PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>>>>> About time i got back to blogging about EFL etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://phab.enlightenment.org/phame/live/1//post/yet_another_c_object_model_but_better/
>>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> thanks for the explanations. Trying to reproduce the steps, the result
>>>> of my tst.c
>>>> differd a bit, though. I didn't get
>>>>
>>>>      EOLIAN static void
>>>>      _tst_eo_base_constructor(Eo *obj, Tst_Data *pd)
>>>>      {
>>>>         eo_do_super(obj, TST_CLASS, eo_constructor());
>>>>      }
>>>>
>>>>      EOLIAN static void
>>>>      _tst_eo_base_destructor(Eo *obj, Tst_Data *pd)
>>>>      {
>>>>         eo_do_super(obj, TST_CLASS, eo_destructor());
>>>>      }
>>>>
>>>> but instead
>>>>
>>>>      EOLIAN static void
>>>>      _tst_class_constructor(Eo_Class *klass)
>>>>      {
>>>>      }
>>>>      EOLIAN static void
>>>>      _tst_class_destructor(Eo_Class *klass)
>>>>      {
>>>>      }
>>>>
>>>> Is there a more detailed documentation of the Eo-Syntax and API
>>>> somewhere?
>>>> Becuase the one on docs.enlightenment.org is not so verbose or maybe
>>>> outdated.
>>>> Is this because there will be more changes to Eo and things are not
>>>> fixed yet?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your help,
>>>>
>>>> Jean Rene Dawin
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Want excitement?
>>>> Manually upgrade your production database.
>>>> When you want reliability, choose Perforce
>>>> Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
>>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> enlightenment-devel mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>>>>
>>> You should try with Base.constructor instead of class.constructor (same
>>> for the destructor).
>>
>> I meant Eo.Base.constructor.
>
> One important thing to mention is that while we try not to, we change
> the Eolian syntax every now and then. Same goes with some of the class
> names and hierarchy, so the blog post may not be a 1-1 to what's
> currently in.
>
> --
> Tom.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Want excitement?
> Manually upgrade your production database.
> When you want reliability, choose Perforce
> Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>


-- 
-- 
Amitesh

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to