2016-05-06 14:00 GMT+02:00 Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com>: > On Fri, 6 May 2016 10:08:40 +0200 Davide Andreoli <d...@gurumeditation.it> > said: > > > 2016-05-06 4:01 GMT+02:00 Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com>: > > > > > On Thu, 5 May 2016 23:16:56 +0200 Davide Andreoli < > d...@gurumeditation.it> > > > said: > > > > > > or use png's - keep the svg's in the tree as "originals" but export to > > > bimap > > > from inkscape. > > > > > > > This will duplicate the files in git, they are lots of files, we are now > > something like > > 3MB of icons, I was trying to avoid cluttering the repo. The svg format > > also works > > better with git as it's a text format, so future icon changes commits (I > > plan lots of > > them) will be slim. > > also another problem. the resulting theme will depend on how much the host > rsvg > lib can handle and what it does and does not render correctly from the svg > file. of course often this is due to inkscape using extensions of its > own... > but the point still stands. someone can't be guaranteed the same .edj file > contents because system will alter it as at edje_cc the svg is rendered to > a > bitmap by librsvg. >
indeed this is a good point, different rsvg can be a problem, and no rsvg installed can be a problem too. > > having more png data in the tree is no harm. the text format is irrelevant > as > no one will be DIFFING the svg to figure stuff out. it's a visual thing - > the > svg is not hand edited. it's generated by a tool. treat it as a visual > thing. > you want visual diffs. text is not relevant as it's not hand edited. :) > My point was not on reading the diff, it was just on not having the binary file change at each icon commit. > > > Another reason I'm trying to avoid this is to keep my workflow as simple > as > > possible, > > that will means I can provide more icons in less time. > > by doing so you set up our build to produce a different theme on different > systems. :) > I start to think you are right... I will then add all the png version if no one have other valid point on using svg. Ok, just leave out my icon problem for a moment... do we still want to merge the generic loaders? it make sense to make the merge to me also without the current issue. We are merging elm in this release, causing trouble to users and packagers, if we think it's sensible to also merge the last 2 pieces this is the right moment IMO. My point is: do it now or never do it. > > > > beware librsvg != inskcape. inskcape has features it can put into svg's > > > that > > > rsvg CAN'T draw right. it's SAFER to generate the png's and use those. > > > > > > > Yes, I'm aware of this. It's just a matter of checking your icons after > the > > draw and > > don't use "strange" inkscape feature. I also have the idea (not tested > yet) > > to > > save the files as "plain svg" instead of "inkscape svg". > > last time i tried, masking i think combined with clipping and blur did > this. > these are not strange filters. they are really common/basic. :) these are > incredibly useful and having to avoid them is seriously a bit pain. > > > > > ok, we are hitting a problem with evas-generic-loaders because it's > not > > > > merged in the efl tree. > > > > > > > > The problem is that we are now using svg icons in the elementary > theme, > > > all > > > > the new FDO icons are in svg format. But, now that elm is merged in > efl, > > > > the default theme is built before the user can install > > > evas-generic-loaders > > > > and thus the theme cannot be build for the lack of the svg loader. > > > > > > > > After some chatting we agreed that the "best" way to solve the issue > is > > > to > > > > also merge evas-generic-loaders in efl. > > > > The alternative solution is to duplicate all the icons in a raster > > > format, > > > > that seems really a waste of space/bandwidth/git-history on each icon > > > > change and will make my work of providing icons much harder. > > > > > > > > Any objections? problems? me and cedric already agreed on this > solution, > > > > and also > > > > agreed that make sense to also merge emotion-generics, so we will > finally > > > > have a single efl package! > > > > > > > > > > > > If no objections arise I will ask TAsn to do the same git work he > did for > > > > elm (merging the git tree in a branch?) so that cedric can do the > > > required > > > > autofoo stuff (already agreed with him) > > > > > > > > > > > > In the mean time I have to disable :( all the new icons so that > everyone > > > > can build efl without problems. I hope this will not create some side > > > > effects, as it is now possible that some old icons are missing. Let > me > > > know > > > > for any issue. > > > > > > > > davemds > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications > > > Manager > > > > Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple > > > tiers of > > > > your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly > and > > > > reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial! > > > > https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > enlightenment-devel mailing list > > > > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" > -------------- > > > The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com > > > > > > > > > -- > ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- > The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
