Hello. On 02/20/2017 06:25 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > Hello. > > On 02/16/2017 12:14 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >> On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 10:08:29 -0800 Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr> said: >> >>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:04 AM, Stefan Schmidt <ste...@osg.samsung.com> >>> wrote: >>>> On 14/02/17 16:11, Stefan Schmidt wrote: >>>> emile_image.h, libemile.so.1.19.0 >>>> emile_image_register ( Emile_Image* image, Emile_Action_Cb callback, >>>> Emile_Action action, void const* data ) >>>> >>>> Maybe rename this to emile_image_cb_register? >>> >>> Hum, we usually use callback_add and callback_del for the name. I have >>> not implemented a callback_del and we only handle one callback at the >>> moment and not a list (As it wasn't necessary for the specific >>> behavior of that callback). I guess and I should go with our more >>> classic approach ? > > If you plan to add a callback delete operation to this at some point you > could go ahead and name it: > > emile_image_callback_add > >> callback_set? > > Use this if you do not plan to add the delete functionality: > > emile_image_callback_set > > If we assume just one callback this is fine and a better name compared > to what we have right now.
Cedric, which one these are you going to choose? Are you going to handle this or do you want me to change it? regards Stefan Schmidt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
