Hello, On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 6:09 AM, Stefan Schmidt <ste...@osg.samsung.com> wrote: > Hello. > > On 02/20/2017 06:25 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote: >> Hello. >> >> On 02/16/2017 12:14 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 10:08:29 -0800 Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr> said: >>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:04 AM, Stefan Schmidt <ste...@osg.samsung.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> On 14/02/17 16:11, Stefan Schmidt wrote: >>>>> emile_image.h, libemile.so.1.19.0 >>>>> emile_image_register ( Emile_Image* image, Emile_Action_Cb callback, >>>>> Emile_Action action, void const* data ) >>>>> >>>>> Maybe rename this to emile_image_cb_register? >>>> >>>> Hum, we usually use callback_add and callback_del for the name. I have >>>> not implemented a callback_del and we only handle one callback at the >>>> moment and not a list (As it wasn't necessary for the specific >>>> behavior of that callback). I guess and I should go with our more >>>> classic approach ? >> >> If you plan to add a callback delete operation to this at some point you >> could go ahead and name it: >> >> emile_image_callback_add >> >>> callback_set? >> >> Use this if you do not plan to add the delete functionality: >> >> emile_image_callback_set >> >> If we assume just one callback this is fine and a better name compared >> to what we have right now. > > Cedric, which one these are you going to choose? Are you going to handle > this or do you want me to change it?
I am leaning toward callback_set. Will do that next week as I am flying around today. -- Cedric BAIL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
