On 04/12/2017 08:27 AM, Christophe Sadoine wrote:
> On 12 April 2017 at 06:15, Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>> <barbi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 7:12 PM, Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>> We're incurring in the same error as we did for EDC, thinking much of
>>> our side instead of users... EDC started as something for designers
>>> but then we never provided WYSIWYG and it sucked... the primitives are
>>> all there, but unusable for the naive or designers.
>>>
>>> the only way to describe this is to create a WYSIWYG first, then come
>>> with some format to store it... But do that as the *USER* point of
>>> view, not from EFL development PoV. Ignore our terms, ignore our
>>> limitations, try to make design use cases and then we see how to
>>> implement that with our tech, adding features and removing limitations
>>> as needed.
>>
>> That's where I have a different opinion. Developers are bad with
>> WYSIWYG interface. Designers are the users of that potential WYSIWYG
>> interface. Problem is that in the population we are trying to address,
>> a large portion of them are developers without a sidekick designer.
>> They are the one who want to be able to do simple UI "assemblage" from
>> a file. EDC is way to complicated and powerful for what they want. We
>> actually do not have anything to address the needs of this people.
>> This is what I am talking above.
> 
> You say the population you are trying to address have a large portion
> of developers.
> You also said in your original email that there was 3 groups :
> developers, developers, developers :D
> I just want to mention, please don't forget about the designers or
> even "wannabe designers".
> I get the "more developers -> more apps -> more e/efl users"
> But until 0.16, I think e became what it was in part because of themes
> and customization.
> There was a bunch of themes and it was fun :)
> 
> Everybody knows making a theme takes time. I think one reason is
> because you have to recompile your edc just to see what happens when
> you changed an offset. (I am currently trying to make a simple theme)
> If I could just change a line and see the change instantly I would be
> so happy. Enventor is nice but of course it has to recompile all edc
> files.

when I'm doing minor things like that I just import my .edj file into
eflete use it to figure out what values I want then copy the values back
into the .edc files. This is the most efficient way for me but i've
spent a long time reading .edc files probably alot more then most.

-- 

Simon Lees (Simotek)                            http://simotek.net

Emergency Update Team                           keybase.io/simotek
SUSE Linux                           Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30
GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to