On 19/07/17 09:53, Cedric BAIL wrote: > > I also dislike cmake for its syntax and its limited support for cross > compilation. Also none of our dependencies have managed to move to cmake, > while the one who tried meson managed in no time. Give a look at > enlightenment meson files and at efl cmake file to make your own opinion > there. My opinion here is that meson is on track to be the replacement of > autotools in the open source community. > > Cedric
As someone who spent 5 years using cmake to cross compile for a range of arm and android targets your going to have a tough time convincing me it has limited support for cross compiling. Its also worth stating that the majority of Qt/KDE based projects are all using cmake and have been doing so for a long time so saying that Meson is on track to be the one replacement probably isn't fair Until many of the cmake projects start migrating as well. * Disclaimer, i'm currently one of the cmake maintainers for openSUSE. I also don't mind if we go to meson or cmake as long as its done consistently. -- Simon Lees (Simotek) http://simotek.net Emergency Update Team keybase.io/simotek SUSE Linux Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30 GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel