On 19/07/17 09:53, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> 
> I also dislike cmake for its syntax and its limited support for cross
> compilation. Also none of our dependencies have managed to move to cmake,
> while the one who tried meson managed in no time. Give a look at
> enlightenment meson files and at efl cmake file to make your own opinion
> there. My opinion here is that meson is on track to be the replacement of
> autotools in the open source community.
> 
> Cedric

As someone who spent 5 years using cmake to cross compile for a range of
arm and android targets your going to have a tough time convincing me it
has limited support for cross compiling. Its also worth stating that the
majority of Qt/KDE based projects are all using cmake and have been
doing so for a long time so saying that Meson is on track to be the one
replacement probably isn't fair Until many of the cmake projects start
migrating as well.

* Disclaimer, i'm currently one of the cmake maintainers for openSUSE. I
also don't mind if we go to meson or cmake as long as its done consistently.

-- 

Simon Lees (Simotek)                            http://simotek.net

Emergency Update Team                           keybase.io/simotek
SUSE Linux                           Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30
GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to