Just one comment. 2017-07-19 14:01 GMT+09:00 Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr>:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com> > wrote: [...] > > > i think efl is more easily moved than cedric says. it can be done in > stages. > > just have the core build work with default + commonly enabled options > only. > > forget examples, tests, docs etc. ... THEN add in these bit by bit until > it is > > fully featured. > > I disagree with this view completely. It will never be finished and we > won't ever have all our needs addressed. People and most dev will stay > on autotools and won't ever be moving. It needs to be done in two > release. First we do side by side feature equivalent and deprecate > autotools, then for the next release we phase out autotools > completely. Any other approach will lead to failure in my opinion. > We saw what happened with the dual main Makefile + per directory Makefile. Even those of us who wanted it the most forgot about it quickly and just let those Makefiles rot. So, yeah. :) [...] -- Jean-Philippe André ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
