On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 22:23:40 -0400 Christopher Michael <cpmicha...@comcast.net> said:
> As is apparent here: > > http://home.comcast.net/~devilhorns/run_ff.png > > It works fine with current svn of e17 & efl (as of this writing). I > would try updating to the latest and greatest that you can...(ideally > from svn, but you have already stated that you don't want to do that) :) > > If the problem does persist for you, the only way we can really be of > help would be if you had a gdb backtrace of the crash (which would > require installed from svn and building with -g, etc, etc). well if he doesnt want to upgrade to svn and it's fixed.. there is NOTHING he can do. it's upgrade and have something that works or live with what he has. not much in between (well unless he wishes to patch his own code and rebuild - but i am assuming that is even harder tan upgrade , so ruling it out) > In case you feel brave one day ;) here is a link to getting backtraces :) > http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/Debugging > > devilhorns > > On 04/17/2010 10:09 PM, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: > > > > On 4/10/10 a: pacman -Syu :destabilized e17's run command dialog on my > > Arch Linux installation. > > > > Yes I know e17 is still under heavy development, so I can't > > expect it to be completely stable. But I thought I should bring this > > up even though I found a workaround that works for me. > > > > And I know this "could" be a distro specific problem... But I don't think > > so because: > > > > To quote from the Arch wiki: > > > > http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Linux > > > > -> Arch provides non-patched, vanilla software; packages are offered from > > -> pure upstream sources, how the author originally intended it be > > -> distributed. Patching only occurs in extremely rare cases, to prevent > > -> severe breakage in the instance of version mismatches that may occur > > -> within a rolling release model. > > > > However I am a multi-Linux/multi-boot kind of guy, who in each and > > every distro I install, heavily depends on their package management > > system to keep me out of dependency hel^Hck... ;-7 > > > > And e17 is definitely one "package" that I wouldn't even attempt to > > install by hand. > > > > But of all my currently installed distros, Arch is the one that seems > > most likely to install an unadulterated upstream package, rather than a > > distro specific {modified} version. > > > > Thus I don't think the fact that the only e17 on my laptop that this has > > happened to, is the one in Arch, automatically makes it a distro specific > > issue. It probably only means the Arch e17 is more accurately updated... > > At least that's mt best guess. > > > > I'm not really sure what was the e17 version number that I installed to Arch > > sometime since my mid March initial installation of Arch itself, but as > > of now the e17 "help about" lists it as "Enlightenment 0.16.999.063". > > Prior to this recent "pacman -Syu", e17's run prompt worked normally. > > Afterwards it's become fussy what the first character I input into it is. > > That is to say, I usually start opera via the run prompt and when I type > > "o" the command history displays the last instance of the command And I can > > in fact start opera. Yet I also use firefox {though I usually start that > > from inside alpine}. The other day I tried to start firefox from the run > > prompt. But as soon as I typed an "f" into the first character position of > > the command input field, I got a pop-up error telling me that > > "Enlightenment SEGV'd" That also advised me to compile everything with "-g > > in CFLAGS" So far, the the restore button succeeds in restarting e17 > > without closing any open applications... But of course firefox didn't > > start. I can start firefox from an xterm. And I tested that I can type "of" > > into the run prompt without an immediate SEGV But I can't type an f as the > > first character. I haven't tested the whole alphabet, BUT I did find I > > can't type a command starting with "b" or "/" as the first character > > either. Though just because I'm stubborn I can tell you that I can start > > firefox [via e17's run prompt] with: "~/../../usr/bin/firefox" (go figure) > > > > I did say I've got a work around that works for me... Since I've also got > > XFCE installed as a back-up desktop, I've reassigned the keybinding I used > > to use to pull up e17's run prompt with, to "/usr/bin/xfrun4". Which works > > just fine. > > > > I don't know if this is a known issue or a new one. But I thought I > > should mention it. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-users mailing list > enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users > -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
