> Think of the MacOS Classic to MacOS X transition as the Win 3.1 to Win 95 > transition. (Although, in truth, it is a transition of far greater scale). I prefer to compare it with my transition from Win 3.1 to WinNT at work. WinNT is a completely new operating system that just happens to be able to run most of the old Win16-applications in an emulation process (->Classic in OSX). It also supports the old APIs from Win16 (->Carbon), but to be able to take advantage of the new features, you loose any backward compatibility. The main difference is IMHO that Microsoft also released an OS called Win95 that stood somehow in between these two extremes. Apple decided to omit this step. Christof -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To search the archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
- Re: Now this is way off topic, it was: Re... Neil
- Re: Now this is way off topic, it was: Re... Peter Gort
- Re: Now this is way off topic, it was: Re... Michael W. Wellman
- Re: Now this is way off topic, it was: Re... Christian M. M. Brady
- Re: Now this is way off topic, it was: Re... Michael W. Wellman
- Re: Now this is way off topic, it was: Re... Eric Hildum
- Re: Now this is way off topic, it was: Re... Bryan Harris
- Re: Now this is way off topic, it was: Re... Andrew Schmiechen
- Re: Now this is way off topic, it was: Re... Thomas Chirpich
- Re: Reverting to Outlook Express Michael W. Wellman
- Re: Reverting to Outlook Express Christof Stadler
- Re: Reverting to Outlook Express Dan Crevier
- Re: Reverting to Outlook Express Christof Stadler
- Re: Reverting to Outlook Express Michael W. Wellman
- Awesome discussion Bill Wood
- Re: Reverting to Outlook Express Omar Shahine
- Re: Reverting to Outlook Express Paul Berkowitz
- Re: Reverting to Outlook Express jud spencer
- Re: Reverting to Outlook Express Christian M. M. Brady
- Comparing Bill Wood
- Re: Comparing Jeff Porten
