On 1/21/03 10:09 AM, "Norman W. Ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah... I was hoping that sorting by company, then by name, would retain the > sort order of the company within name if there was no name. But what I hear > you saying is that by sorting on name (i.e. clicking the name column) wipes > out any previous sort operation entirely. Too bad. > > So yes... Sub sorting (either explicit or implicit) would seem to me to be a > GoodThing�. If you assign a category for each company then you can find by category and they will be sorted also by name. -- Diane Ross MVP Entourage (MVPs are volunteers) Entourage Help Page <http://www.entourage.mvps.org/> -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
