on 1/22/03 1:14 PM, Paul Berkowitz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 1/21/03 3:56 PM, "Norman W. Ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The current default (as I understood from Paul's earlier missive) of sorting
>> by creation order when such fields are empty would almost never be useful,
>> IMHO.
>
> It doesn't actually _do_ anything to sort by that order. That's just what
> happens since it doesn't do anything.
>
{Snip of work-around process, which will serve.}
Thanks Paul, I'll most likely end up doing something along the lines of what
you've suggested.
(And, BTW, I'm a [very] recent purchaser of your SyncEntX>AB script; keep up
the good work.)
Open nets...
--
Norman Ferguson | Dir. of Technology Services | Tekgnosys
Member, Apple Consultants Network | Microsoft Certified Professional
Office: 540-387-4422 | Cell: 540-819-4014 | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1917 Maylin Drive; Suite 103 | Salem, VA 24153
--
To unsubscribe:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/>
old-archive:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
