Oh for goodness sake. Richard is not talking about web-based graphics HTML.
He's just talking about the sort of rich text that Entourage's HTML can do.

Go ahead and use HTML, Richard. Yours are always very tasteful. It' true
that there are some people who have these quasi-religious objections to it
that you've just seen here. Puritans. so once in a while you'll offend
someone, I suppose. You probably don't have too many friends with that sort
of objection-on-principle. It's mostly only old-time usenet geeks who feel
that way. I wonder if they bleach their magazines too, and watch only
black-and-white TV.

As Jud said, almost all email clients nowadays can read the plain text
version that Entourage always sends out to accompany the HTML version. so if
anyone has that sort of reader, or chooses to view only plain text, they'll
see your message OK in plain text. And everyone else will get your tasteful
HTML.

-- 
Paul Berkowitz
MVP Entourage
Entourage FAQ Page: http://www.entourage.mvps.org/toc.html

PLEASE always state which version of Entourage you are using - 2001 or X.
It's often impossible to answer your questions otherwise.


> From: Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Entourage:mac Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 19:22:17 -0600
> To: "Entourage:mac Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: To html or not to html
> 
> 
> 
> HTML mail has its place for use in customer relations and emailing lists
> that folks want to be part of and desire graphic email. My area chamber of
> commerce for example. The members are much more please with the current html
> mail event announcements and calendar than they were with the plain text.
> They all have the option to provide feedback and to be removed or to receive
> fax announcements. All feedback has been positive. The emails follow a
> consistent standard and are tiny in size.
> 
> Spam that is html sux.
> 
> 
> For what it's worth...
> 
> 
> Cole
> 
> On 11/14/03 5:49 PM, "Matthew Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> on 15/11/03 10:27 AM, George at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> 
>>>> Obviously, html formatting I email create possibilities of nicer
>>>> presentation.
>>>> However, I have a friend who says that I shouldn't use html because some
>>>> people's computer's can't receive that and they just get confusing symbols.
>>>> What's your advice � use it or not?
>>> 
>>> I vote for not using it. Most of the time it serves no useful purpose over
>>> plain text.  Often makes quoting parts of a message a pain. Quotes in
>>> replies are not as obvious as in plain test using standard >. Wastes
>>> bandwidth and disk space.  Don�t need �nicer presentations� email.
>> 
>> Most of the time I just use plain text. Most text doesn't need any
>> formatting, but there are times I do. Where I work we are dealing with
>> films. An email looks much better when the title of films are displayed in
>> italic. Some times I want some items in bold, so they stand out in the
>> message. I find lately that a lot of people don't read email messages
>> thouroughly and miss certain items that are important. I know I know I am
>> also guilty of doing this.
>> 
>> I have discovered in Entourage you can swap to html, and use the number and
>> bullet list feature. If you then convert to plain text the numbers stay and
>> bullets are converted to asterisks. This can provide some simple formatting
>> without needing to send html. The indent converts to quoting with ">" which
>> is not desired.
>> 
>>> Don�t need �nicer presentations� email.
>> 
>> I am wondering about your use of curly quotes. Do you actually use them or
>> are you just doing a take on formatting? I wouldn't use them in plain text
>> email messages as they are not part of 7-bit ASCII.
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> archives:
> <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/>
> old-archive:
> <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/>
old-archive:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>

Reply via email to