On 5/28/04 6:37 PM, "Entourage:mac Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Feature parity is a red herring. > > Perhaps that's true from a development and/or marketing perspective, but my > experience is different. Because of the features 'missing' in Entourage > compared to Outlook, I have to be very careful before offering to switch a > PC user to a Mac or try and wean a Mac user off Outlook 2001. > > In some cases we can work around the issues with OWA or even Citrix, but I > would still trade the Project Center and three column view for solid > Exchange integration any day - and I know for a fact that I am not alone in > this. If I were, Snerdware wouldn't have any customers for their AddressX > and Groupcal products. Can someone PLEASE explain to me what snerdware does that every other third party DAV client for Exchange doesn't ALSO do? Because I can't see a single friggin' advantage. john -- Instead of throwing tomatoes, why not try lobbing the whole plant at someone? - Alex Welch -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
