Joris & group:

I have also seen a dramatic slowdown in Entourage across a variety of
different systems (Powerbook, iMac, PowerMac G4/5), all with sufficient RAM.
Systems are almost all on 10.3.x, although I am seeing it on Tiger as well.

This slowdown is most noticeable in Entourage, where many of my users have
reported a periodic "SPOD" (spinning pinwheel of doom). This results in
Entourage being temporarily frozen, which many users perceive as a crash.
Entourage always recovers from this, but the delay is quite annoying.

I am not sure, but I believe that this delay corresponds with the running of
my "Send & Receive All" schedule. This delay was imperceptible and/or not
present in previous versions of Entourage.

Incidentally, most of my users are connecting to Exchange 2000. Not sure if
this may be a contributing factor or not.

Anyone else seeing this? Any advice? Help!
 
Andrew Cunningham
Systems Support Analyst (Mac guy)
Butler University
317-940-4357
http://www.butler.edu

> From: Joris Lieftinck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 12:56:49 +0200
> Subject: Office 2004 very slow
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Since the installation of Office 2004 (now upgraded to 11.1.1) I notice a
> considerable increase of loading and other time that the various parts of
> Office seem to need before one actually can go to work, compared to Office X's
> behaviour. Admitted, my Mac's are rather old (2000-2001, since puchase also
> changed from OS 9.2.2 to 10.3.9 by now).
> Does everyone of you experience the same slowness when using e.g. Word (and
> especially Entourage, where synchronizing takes a lot of time too)?
> Does somebody know whether upgrading internal memory from 256 MB to 512 MB
> would make things much better? Is there another hint to be given if memory is
> not the bottleneck?
> 
> TIA
> 
> Joris

-- 
To unsubscribe:                     
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
archives:       
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/>
old-archive:       
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>

Reply via email to