On Sat, 26 May 2001 12:17:05 -0700, you wrote:
>I planning on adding a lens and am pondering what to choose.
>
>I'm currently using the Canon 28-105 f3.5 and Canon 17-35 2.8L.
>I know the the 28-70 2.8 L is superior to the 28-105 but am
>getting acceptable results with the 28-105. the Canon 100mm
>Macro would allow me to do Macro and seems to be well regarded
>for overall sharpness. the 35mm f 1.4 L would extend my low
>light level capabilities.
>
>I'm interested in hearing thoughts and opinions on these
>alternatives. Oh, I can only afford to choose one.
>
>Thanks,
>JimD
>
Unless you *really" need those 2 extra stops at 35mm - 2.8 is fairly
fast after all - I'd go with the 100mm Macro - it adds a lot more to
your kit. But then I don't know what your low light needs are for
the 35mm. They may override. I have the Tamron 20-40 f/2.8 and so
far it covers my w/a needs just fine. 90/100/105mm Macro is high on
my list.
Jes my 2 coppers
Ken Durling
Website http://home.earthlink.net/~kdurling/
Alternate e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
