Daniel,
Thanks, I think I haven't given the longer lens as much
consideration as I generally work in the shorter focal lengths.
The 70 - 200 is on my 'dream' list though.
My biggest consternation is about whether to keep the 28 - 105 and
diversify, or if I should replace it with the 28 -70.
Thanks,
JimD
At 09:44 PM 5/26/01 +0200, you wrote:
From: "JimD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(...)
> I'm currently using the Canon 28-105 f3.5 and Canon 17-35 2.8L.
> I know the the 28-70 2.8 L is superior to the 28-105 but am
> getting acceptable results with the 28-105. the Canon 100mm
> Macro would allow me to do Macro and seems to be well regarded
> for overall sharpness. the 35mm f 1.4 L would extend my low
> light level capabilities.
The lens may vary on your kind of photography you'r doing !
Why not a 70-200/2,8 ? Optically a gem.
-- PhOTo -- vOYaGe -- GrAPhiSMe --
Portail : http://perso.magic.fr/drocha
Groupe fran�ais Canon EOS :
http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/canoneos_fr/
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
