JimD wrote:
>
> I planning on adding a lens and am pondering what to choose.
>
> I'm currently using the Canon 28-105 f3.5 and Canon 17-35 2.8L.
> I know the the 28-70 2.8 L is superior to the 28-105 but am
> getting acceptable results with the 28-105. the Canon 100mm
> Macro would allow me to do Macro and seems to be well regarded
> for overall sharpness. the 35mm f 1.4 L would extend my low
> light level capabilities.
>
> I'm interested in hearing thoughts and opinions on these
> alternatives. Oh, I can only afford to choose one.
>
What's your number one priority? Macro or low light level
capabilities? That'll answer your question. Besides, you can
get the 100mm Macro plus a nice 35/2 or 50/1.4 for less than
the price of the 35/1.4. ;-) Both are excellent lenses, BTW.
If you don't need both, the 35mm focal length and the f/1.4
aperture, one of those might save you a lot of money.
Thomas Bantel
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
