From: F. Craig Callahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> So, setting aside the idea
> of renting an expensive lens for a major trip such as the one in this
case, the
> most cost-effective options (at least based on US prices), would seem to
be a
> second-hand 300/4L or the Sigma 300/4 APO Macro HSM or 400/5.6 APO Macro
HSM. I
> don't know much about the Sigma lenses, but they almost certainly must be
better
> than the Tamron 28-200 zoom.
I had a Sigma 300/4 APO Macro, used on an EOS 3 and EOS 50. And it's a good
choice. The lens is sharp, cheap, and well made. It performs far better than
any 28-200.
<�+�> PhOTo <�+�> GrAPhiSMe <�+�>
Portail : http://perso.magic.fr/drocha
Groupe fran�ais Canon EOS :
http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/canoneos_fr/
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
