> "Willem-Jan Markerink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ...
> I only bought it for EOS-compatibility, and web-pictures, or quick
> ones by email....don't want to mess with a clunky Nikon interface of
> course....:))
> Besides, I considered that *when* buying an 1n, this would be the
> only rational reason to do so, other than the 1n-RS (though I wonder
> why they didn't offer that one as DCS-1/3/5 too....if only to get rid
> of that mirror sound....wouldn't have added much to the US$17k
> either....:))
> (might have to do with the more integrated construction of
> body&motordrive, preventing the digi-back/grip)
> I am now considering one of these SCF-upgrades at Canon-service, to
> delay mirror-rebound until you lift your finger from the
> release-button....:))
Hi WJM,
A 1.8 kg Point and Shoot for web pictures and e-mail :-)
Hmm, 1.3 Megapixel with a 1.67x filter factor. I checked the
DCS-3 on my lens calculator, and found out that a wide angle
like the 20mm produces the equivalent view as a 35mm lens!
http://members.home.net/jul.loke/
A Powershot Pro-90 IS (2.6 Megapixel), G1 (3 MP) or G2 (4 MP)
will produce much better pictures, with a similar EOS-like
interface. Well, except for the shutter speed limitation
with the lens stopped down. And the incompatibility with EZ
flash. And the poor compatibility with EX flash.
Well, the DCS-3 supposed does badly with TTL flash too :-)
Can you report if this is true? How about A-TTL?
Cheers
Julian Loke
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
