Whenever I am unhappy with my shots I usually find that I am unhappy
over 95% of the time because they are not sharp(here I would have liked
to have IS) -(I use non-IS L lenses/tripod/mlu/release, sometimes with
a 1.4X) and only less than 5% of the time because of the exposure.
suresh
""
tom wrote
http://www.moose395.net/tips/2000.html
Moose Peterson is a famous Nikon photographer. I stumbled onto his site
and was reading his tips. In one of the tips on the above
page, Moose really pans IS, stating that it is not necessary if you use
correct technique (I believe it was writtern before Moose
got his own Nikon VR lens.) Thus, IS really isn't handy. (I agree with
regards to the 600 IS, who the heck is going to hand-hold
that, the 28-135 or 70-200 may be different cases, though)
But the interesting part of the tip is that Moose basically states that
people who go to Canon because of IS are losing out because
the metering on the Nikon F5 is so much superior. I am curious if
anyone here has done a comparison between Nikon and Canon
metering.
Tom D
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
