> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kotsinadelis, > You find the 70-200 more versatile yet have never owned a 100-400mm? > Am interesting paradox. Re-read my message and you will see that I have owned a 100-400. It wasn't a Canon but that does not really matter for making a judgment about versatility. As a matter of fact, I don't think I even have to own 100-400 lens to make such a judgment. I know my shooting style and my needs and from that it is clear to me that the 70-200 is by far a better solution for me then the 100-400. Robert * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- Re: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Elgenper Telia
- Re: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Skip
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Robert Meier
- Re: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Hugo Lopes
- Re: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Lawrance Lee
- Re: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Bob Meyer
- Re: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Daniel ROCHA
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Robert Meier
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Bob Meyer
- Re: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Ray Amos
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Robert Meier
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Bob Meyer
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Gary Fisher
- Re: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Hugo Lopes
- Re: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Ken Durling
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)