Michael Quack [EMAIL PROTECTED] said, > The 35-350 on the other hand is not the sharpest lens > in Canon's portfolio. It is rather versatile, but....
> Hmm. Would I sacrifice quality for ease of comfort? The 35-350 is probably decent for portraits and lends them a nice soft focus effect. Some of the nicest portraits (at least according to the person being photographed) we taken with my old 75-300. The 70-200 f2.8 is a lot sharper and some older women tend to complain about the wrinkles. Ed * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
