On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 14:11 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > Do we want nagios to be upgraded to 3.0? The 2.x branch is still being > maintained upstream and we're still using it in Fedora. There would be a > requirement to change some of the config files, but nothing horrible.
It could always be package labeled as "nagios3" for now, and co-exist with "nagios" (2.x) until 2.x is no longer developed upstream. Just a suggestion. -- Bryan J Smith Senior Consultant Red Hat GPS SE US mailto:[email protected] +1 (407) 489-7013 (Mobile) mailto:[email protected] (non-RH/ext to Blackberry) -------------------------------------------------------- You already know Red Hat as the entity dedicated to 100% no-IP-strings-attached, community software development. But do you know where CIOs rate Red Hat versus other software and services firms for their own, direct needs? It's no comparison: http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
