I like that idea. While I do think its cool to run updates and be pleasantly surprised by brand new versions of software, I can see how some people might not be so receptive in an enterprise environment.
-Adam On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Bryan J Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 14:11 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: >> Do we want nagios to be upgraded to 3.0? The 2.x branch is still being >> maintained upstream and we're still using it in Fedora. There would be a >> requirement to change some of the config files, but nothing horrible. > > It could always be package labeled as "nagios3" for now, and co-exist > with "nagios" (2.x) until 2.x is no longer developed upstream. Just a > suggestion. > > > -- > Bryan J Smith Senior Consultant Red Hat GPS SE US > mailto:[email protected] +1 (407) 489-7013 (Mobile) > mailto:[email protected] (non-RH/ext to Blackberry) > -------------------------------------------------------- > You already know Red Hat as the entity dedicated to 100% > no-IP-strings-attached, community software development. > But do you know where CIOs rate Red Hat versus other > software and services firms for their own, direct needs? > It's no comparison: http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ > > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list > -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com --------------------------------------------------------- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
