On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Bryan J Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 18:25 -0500, Michael Stahnke wrote: >> Just a question, do people in Enterprises apply updates in EPEL >> without reading through each one and ensuring it's compatible with >> your needs/design? We review most every update, mostly curious. > > My clients bring in select updates into their YUM Custom Repos or Red > Hat Network (RHN) Satellite Server Custom Channels, and rarely tap the > repo directly. But there could be some putting the EPEL YUM Repo > directly into their yum.conf/yum.repos.d. > We have pulled EPEL directly in some cases, but still, we don't apply updates without really looking into them. I think that's more what I was trying to ask. I hope people aren't just running yum-cron or 'yum -y update' in cron on EL. I mean, from a maintainers perspective, having to have Nagios3 and Nagios isn't fun. From a client perspective, you'd probably like both. You'd HATE it if you went from 2->3 and it broke all your monitoring, because you might not catch that for a while...
> > -- > Bryan J Smith Senior Consultant Red Hat GPS SE US > mailto:[email protected] +1 (407) 489-7013 (Mobile) > mailto:[email protected] (non-RH/ext to Blackberry) > -------------------------------------------------------- > You already know Red Hat as the entity dedicated to 100% > no-IP-strings-attached, community software development. > But do you know where CIOs rate Red Hat versus other > software and services firms for their own, direct needs? > It's no comparison: http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ > > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list > _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
