What's the process opt-in at this point? I'm a bit unclear. I see that epel-release was built for EPEL7 (and that the git branch is epel7 instead of el7).
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 3:03 AM, Karel Volný <kvo...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Dne pátek, 13. prosince 2013 17:42:24 CEST, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > >> On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 18:36:48 -0700 >> "T.C. Hollingsworth" <tchollingswo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > ... >>> >>> Yeah, opt-in sounds like a much better idea. :-) >> >> >> Yeah, it does mean slower, but I think it's good to only have those >> things in that are for sure maintained. > > > -1 from me, if I get you right that everyone should ack the packages to be > branched > > I often don't find enough time for the things I'm not paid for, so I see a > potential to miss some "please add your package if you want to have it in > EPEL7" plea > > but that doesn't mean I'd call these things "unmaintained", just the > response times are a bit longer ... > > K. > > -- > Karel Volný > QE BaseOs/Daemons Team > Red Hat Czech, Brno > tel. +420 532294274 > (RH: +420 532294111 ext. 8262074) > xmpp ka...@jabber.cz > :: "Never attribute to malice what can > :: easily be explained by stupidity." > > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel mailing list > epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
