On 16 June 2014 21:28, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 21:03:57 +0200 > Simone Caronni <negativ...@gmail.com> wrote: > > CentOS 7 is being built also for i386 and that would > > mean a lot of semplification into adding packages in EPEL 7. Right > > now the situation is a bit weird as many multilib dependencies cannot > > be satisfied and there are many obstacles in getting i386 binaries to > > run. > > That however, is another kettle of fish. ;) > > So, you are suggesting we move to building against CentOS instead of > RHEL and support 32bit? Where is the CentOS 32bit effort at? >
As far as I know they are coming out with a completely installable i386 tree on release date. A quick look hints that all of the packages are being built for 32 bit as well: Kernel example: http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7.00.04/kernel/20140612172658/ --Simone -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). http://xkcd.com/229/ http://negativo17.org/
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
