Hello, thanks for your answers.
On 17 June 2014 00:59, Jim Perrin <jper...@centos.org> wrote: > > By using CentOS as the basis and not RHEL 7 we could have all the > channels > > that are not used at the moment for building. > > > As much as I'd like to see CentOS as the basis for *everything* (I may > be a bit biased here), I don't think this is a good idea. > > RHEL packages by their very nature will come out first. This puts EPEL > in a position to work with them immediately, and to remain impartial > across the rebuilding community (springdale/puias, centos, SL, that > database company, etc). If CentOS lags behind for some unforseen reason, > why put everyone else out until we get our act together? Same with every > other rebuild. We know RHEL packages will be out on time every time > because they're the ones delivering them. > Aren't we already using CentOS for EPEL 5 and 6 in the koji/mock buildroots? 32 bit aside, what is the difference for 7? This has been dealt nicely so far. > To me, the only current time it would make sense for CentOS to be the > base repo would be for something RHEL doesn't ship, such as x86 or other > arch. > Considering we had CentOS in the buildroots, how have updates been managed up to now? From my experience I can see CentOS package updates come almost immediately after RHEL ones. Regards, --Simone -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). http://xkcd.com/229/ http://negativo17.org/
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
