Correction: For example, your response below is non sequitur because I never implied that "Science not necessary have "foreseeable practical value in the near future". ' wasn't true. Quite the opposite, in another thread, I implied it was inferior science in some average sense.
On Dec 3, 11:48 am, aruzinsky <aruzin...@general-cathexis.com> wrote: > I can't because I have no PDFs and, if I did, I wouldn't send it to > you because I don't like you because you are a liar. For example, > your response below is non sequitur because I never implied that > "Science not necessary have "foreseeable practical value in the near > future". ' In another thread, I implied it was inferior science in > some average sense. In fact, I feel slightly guilty that I could not > find a practical advantageous use for my published result. But, at > least, I potentially prevented some other researchers from wasting > their time on getting the same result and that lessened my guilt. > > But, I bet that most engineers who publish pure research do not feel > guilty because, unlike me, they define their morality by what is > normal or what is acceptable in their religion and not by what they > believe contributes to the greater good. > > On Dec 3, 4:03 am, Enrique Fynn <enriquef...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Dear Aruzinsky... > > > Science not necessary have "foreseeable practical value in the near > > future", I know a lot of engineers that are in theoretical field. > > > I can't read your paper, could you send a copy to 'enriquef...@gmail.com'? > > > Regards; > > Fynn. > > -- > > "Even a stopped clock is right twice a day" > > > "When I feed the poor, they call me a saint, but when I ask why the > > poor are hungry, they call me a communist." > > _ Dom Helder Camara > > > 2010/12/3 asaye belayneh sibhatu <asun...@gmail.com>: > > > > despite replay don't stop please > > > . > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "Epistemology" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to epistemol...@googlegroups.com. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.-Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to epistemol...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
