Always suspected you were the great sage Nom. On Feb 7, 4:44 pm, nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Does somebody know what Vacuum is ? / Socratus > > The "firm" below says they do... they say they make the best vacuum in the > world......expensive, though (HAR)http://www.kirby.com/ > > > > > > > > On Thursday, February 7, 2013 2:01:24 AM UTC-5, socratus wrote: > > > Does somebody know what Vacuum is ? > > No, we don’t know what Vacuum is. > > 1 > > Paul Dirac wrote: > > ‘ The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion, > > is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t > > correctly > > describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct > > description > > of something more complex? ‘ > > 2. > > The most fundamental question facing 21st century physics will be: > > What is the vacuum? As quantum mechanics teaches us, with > > its zero point energy this vacuum is not empty and the word > > vacuum is a gross misnomer! > > / Prof. Friedwardt Winterberg / > > 3. > > Wikipedia : > > “ Unfortunately neither the concept of space nor of time is well > > defined, > > resulting in a dilemma. If we don't know the character of time nor of > > space, > > how can we characterize either? “ > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime > > 4. > > "Now we know that the vacuum can have all sorts of wonderful effects > > over an enormous range of scales, from the microscopic to the cosmic," > > said Peter Milonni > > from the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. > > 5. > > ‘ All kinds of electromagnetic waves ( including light’s) > > spread in vacuum . . . . thanks to the vacuum, to the specific > > ability of empty space these electromagnetic waves can exist.’ > > / Book : To what physics was come, page 32. R. K. Utiyama. / > > ==. > > So, we know that the vacuum is very important conception in physics > > and nature, but . . . but . . . we don’t know what vacuum is, and > > therefore > > is possible to have many speculations including metaphysical too. > > For example: Danah Zohar wrote: > > > ‘It might even give us some ground to speculate that > > the vacuum itself (and hence the universe) is ‘conscious’. > > / Book ‘The quantum self ’ page 208. / > > # > > ‘If we were looking for something that we could conceive > > of as God within the universe of the new physics, this ground > > state, coherent quantum vacuum might be a good place to start.’ > > / Book ‘The quantum self ’ page 208, by Danah Zohar. / > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danah_Zohar > > > The question is: > > How is it possible to prove Zohar’s metaphysical confirmation > > with physical laws and formulas? > > ==. > > Socratus > > ===.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
