more eurozone bank news.....

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/19/us-eu-bankingunion-idUSBRE92I0UO20130319

By John O'Donnell and Claire Davenport

BRUSSELS | Tue Mar 19, 2013 2:53pm EDT 
 
(Reuters) - The European Union agreed on Tuesday to let the ECB police euro 
zone <http://www.reuters.com/subjects/euro-zone> banks, taking its first 
step towards a banking union just as a levy imposed on Cypriot savers 
showed that the bloc will struggle to respond in a united way to bank 
problems.

The European Parliament and member states' representatives sealed an accord 
reached late last year to give the European Central Bank (ECB) powers to 
supervise euro zone banks from the middle of next year.

That agreement had initially been applauded as a step towards integration. 
But the surprise levy on Cypriot bank deposits agreed as part of the 
country's bailout deal at the weekend has dented confidence that Europe 
will be united in tackling bank problems rather than leaving countries to 
struggle alone.

"The deeply distressing problems faced by Cyprus show how insufficient this 
step is in itself," said Martin Schulz, the German president of the 
European Parliament, calling for an EU-wide scheme to close failing banks 
and guarantee deposits.

Under the deal, banks that have assets of 30 billion euros or more than 
one-fifth of their country's economic output will be overseen by the ECB 
rather than national supervisors.

The ECB will also be allowed to intervene if it sees problems in smaller 
banks as well, giving it the clout to trigger the closure of struggling 
banks.

Although designed chiefly for the 17 countries in the euro zone, non-euro 
countries that sign up for ECB monitoring will be given equal rights of 
representation in the system.

Countries that wish to stay out such as Britain will also be given 
protection from interference from the ECB through a special voting scheme 
to be used when supervisors across the entire 27-member European Union meet.

The agreement, which will later be rubber-stamped by all EU countries, will 
also allow the European Banking Authority to conduct and publish annual 
stress tests on banks, one EU official said.

"This is a fundamental step towards a real banking union which must restore 
confidence in the euro zone's banks," said Michel Barnier, the European 
commissioner in charge of regulation.

The next pillar of the banking union will be the creation of a central 
system to close troubled banks and a fund to cover the costs, ensuring that 
individual countries such as Cyprus or 
Ireland<http://www.reuters.com/places/ireland>are not left to shoulder these 
burdens alone.

But the reluctance of Germany <http://www.reuters.com/places/germany> and 
other economically strong countries to underpin such a fund will make it 
hard to set up.

Paul De Grauwe, an economist with the London School of Economics, said that 
the levy to be imposed on Cypriot savers illustrated the lack of support 
for pooling national resources.

"This is almost a fatal blow to banking union," he said. "The one key 
element of banking union is a system to help each other out and share the 
cost when there is a banking crisis in one country. There is no willingness 
to do that."

LESSONS LEARNED

Nicolas Veron of the Peterson Institute for International Economics think 
tank in Washington said the Cypriot "default on insured deposits" 
undermined efforts to establish a common euro zone approach to dealing with 
failing banks.

"Clearly we don't have a banking union yet, even if we will have single 
supervision," he said. "Deposit guarantee is a central plank of that. I 
hope that lessons will be learned from this episode."

Without a fund or backstop to tackle problem banks wherever they arise, 
there is little chance of breaking the "doom loop" that can drag banks and 
governments down together.

A separate pledge by euro zone leaders to enable the bloc's rescue 
mechanism to directly recapitalize struggling banks once the ECB has taken 
on supervision also appears to be unraveling.

Again, euro zone paymaster Germany is worried it could be forced to foot 
the bill for struggling banks across the region.

Finland, the Netherlands and Germany want any banking problems that arise 
before the ECB takes over as supervisor to be disqualified when it comes to 
applying for assistance from the European Stability Mechanism.

The new role of bank supervisor for the ECB has worried some at the central 
bank, who fear it will interfere in its work as guardian of monetary policy.

Such a conflict of interest would arise if the ECB were to keep interest 
rates low in order to help struggling banks that it is also responsible for 
supervising.

Dutch ECB policymaker Klaas Knot expressed his reservations on Tuesday.

"Quite frankly, if we have arrived in the European Union in quieter waters, 
let's say 10 years down the road or so, I would clearly be open to 
re-evaluating this decision, because there continues to be a fundamental 
tension between monetary policy responsibilities and supervisory 
responsibilities."

(Additional reporting by Robin Emmott in Brussels and Paul Carrel in 
Frankfurt; editing by Ron Askew and Rex Merrifield)


On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 4:18:44 PM UTC-4, nominal9 wrote:
>
> Here's a follow-up on the Cyprus bank situation.... it appears to have 
> been staunched..... W/O levies on accounts....
>
> http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b790219a-909b-11e2-a456-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2O1BjkOa6
>
> On Monday, March 18, 2013 11:18:48 AM UTC-4, nominal9 wrote:
>>
>> Enormous political import... and such.....here's a link to some more 
>> skulduggery in the U.S. financial system....
>>
>> http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-17/sac-s-plotkin-said-to-have-been-tipped-by-analyst.html
>> The more of these "criminals" they catch and put away, the better, I 
>> think....
>> Also heard a breaking story about a run on Cyprus Banks....
>>
>> http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/18/us-cyprus-parliament-idUSBRE92G03I20130318
>> Taxing bank accounts..... I mean... it isn't all that novel, is it 
>> Archytas?... happens all the time in the U.S., right?.... maybe you can 
>> explain the actual issue....was a time when folks put their money in 
>> Switzerland to evade taxes, but I thought those days were over for the 
>> "Euro-zone"... due to new regulations... maybe not?
>>
>> On Sunday, March 17, 2013 5:31:44 PM UTC-4, stephenk wrote:
>>>
>>> Skype is good for me too... Microsoft's pathetic version of Hangout... 
>>> ;-) 
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/17/2013 3:49 PM, archytas wrote: 
>>> > Suspected you meant something similar Stephen - I use Skype to do this 
>>> > - though mostly for work purposes.  I wouldn't be averse. 
>>> > On matters of enormous political import like whether the UK should be 
>>> > in the EU I note the net cost per capita for being in is �74 - about 
>>> > the same as a decent meal with wine for me and Sue.  Nearly all this 
>>> > is spent on farming or 'growth initiatives' (previous area of personal 
>>> > expertise and I know to be entirely useless).  I find it impossible to 
>>> > get too excited about the equivalent of one night out.  If the 
>>> > Eurocrats can kick up all the bother some allege at this price they 
>>> > may have a model for world revolution!  I should no doubt hangout 
>>> > more. 
>>> > 
>>> > On 17 Mar, 06:22, "Stephen P. King" <stephe...@charter.net> wrote: 
>>> >> Ummm FYI:http://www.google.com/+/learnmore/hangouts/ 
>>> >> 
>>> >> On 3/16/2013 2:37 PM, nominal9 wrote: 
>>> >> 
>>> >>> I'm probably not much younger than Archytas.... I may be 
>>> >>> older....."Hangout".... I remember the term from my youth in the 
>>> >>> sixties/seventies.....I take it you mean a face to face meeting.... 
>>> >>> kind of hard for me.... I rarely get to London....I may have been 
>>> >>> there once at an airport awaiting a connecting flight.... and then I 
>>> >>> was still a kid.... in the sixties (like I said)....besides, 
>>> >>> personally, I am not much of a social person, myself.... Archytas 
>>> (as 
>>> >>> a British person).... is probably much more "gregarious"...(HAR).... 
>>> >>> good for him... 
>>> >> -- 
>>> >> Onward! 
>>> >> 
>>> >> Stephen 
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Onward! 
>>>
>>> Stephen 
>>>
>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Epistemology" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to