A petroleum geologist calls all environmentalists frauds (apparently that includes all the scientists who hold a view different from his own).
That's just too ripe. Are we to take the opinion of a petroleum geologist who would seem to have a vested interest in the oil industry, over those of the majority of scientists (and BTW - our own CIA estimates!)? Get real. The original post was just as political as Ralph's reply, and I guess that may have been Ralphs point? Yes, let's ALL keep it civil & respectful ( & real). Fuel is and will continue to be an ongoing economic, strategic, & evironmental issue. We have an entire national & global economy that is critically depedent upon oil and corn. I sincerely hope for the sake of everyone who follows us that we act responsibly and find sustainable solutions to our fuel & energy issues. IMHO - to any rational objective observer, the current global situation in clearly unsustainable, and must be addressed A BIG thanks to Ed for all his ongoing efforts. Dan Hall N3968H @ CNO ---- kgassert <[email protected]> wrote: > Ralph, > > No one brought left or right political parties into this until you did. > But that is typical of liberal view to call people kooks and name > people in vain and not want to allow others views. I was just looking > at the post and going "whatever, seems interesting I guess" and > deleting them. Why can't a liberal do that I wonder? That is a > rhetorical question. > > Kevin1 > > --- In [email protected], "Ralph Finch" <r...@...> wrote: > > > > Say, isn't this email list supposed to be about flying and Coupes? > Neocon > > nonsense and Sarah Palin-style science don't belong here. There are > plenty > > of kook groups for that stuff. > > > > Ralph Finch > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
