Carl Prather wrote "Solar energy has always appealed to me because of 
it's apparent simplicity and the fact we have roof tops everywhere.  
Wattenberg says these alternate forms of energy are pipe dreams 
because they cost too much and we could blanket the countryside with 
solars panels or wind turbines and will have, at best, a spotty, 
underwhelming supply of energy.  He, interestingly, has solar panels 
installed at his house!"  

I view alternative energy sources to be like a good tail wind. It 
certainly helps with speed and fuel burn part of the time. 
Unfortunately you can't depend on a tail wind all of the time. Also, 
A tail wind can make take offs and landings a bit dicey. Mike @ C35



--- In [email protected], Carl Prather <carl_prat...@...> 
wrote:
>
> 
> I never post but I have to comment on Nuclear energy as potential 
source of energy.  We cannot make nor destroy matter so matter 
whether nuclear power plants are made or not doesn't change what 
material exists, just where it's located.  One fellow, in the 1800's, 
tried to estimate to age of the Earth as something like 40,000 years 
of age.  The problem with his calculations is that he did not take 
into account all of the uranium on the planet, which changed the 
Earth's age, based on cooling, up to only 4.5 billion years.  That 
is, and was, a lot uranium.There's a bombastic radio talk show host 
in the San Francisco area named Bill Wattenberg, Dr. Bill as he is 
sometimes called.  He is a nuclear physicist who has worked UC 
Berkeley and Lawrence Livermore Labs.  I always wanted to know to 
what extent spent nuclear rods present a radiation danger to humans 
and the environment.  He says that after few weeks of cooling down, 
the cooling rods sat in free air will emit as much radiation and the 
surrounding area from a distance of 50' or greater.  In each of these 
rods, there is a thimble-sized amount of nuclear material that has a 
half live of several 100,000's of years.  These rods can be processed 
further and even this really long-lived stuff can be re-used.  We 
have hundreds or years of OPEC-free energy setting in the ground.As 
for disposal, he says that storage casks, many times the size needed 
to contain radiation can be built without worry of cask degradation.  
Or, the nuclear material can simply put back in mines which they 
came.  Another plan was to disperse the stuff on the ocean floor in 
amounts that it becomes environmentally inconsequential.  How about 
that!But Wattenberg's biggest criticism of nuclear foes is that coal 
fired plants emit 15,000 tons of radioactive material into U.S. every 
year and that nothing is being done or said about those "radiation 
leaks".  He believes that we should double or triple our nuclear 
generating capacity, shut down most of the "dirty" coal-fired plants 
and the clean burning natural gas plants.  Then we use the excess 
natural gas to power our cars.  Now, we quit using polluting the coal 
plants and cars, using an energy supply that will last 200-300 years 
life from Canada and from domestic sources.   And then there's carbon 
foot print thing and global warming.He rails on environmental groups 
as "wackos" but he also spearheaded legislation to prevent logging 
near rivers because of proven environmental concerns.Solar energy has 
always appealed to me because of it's apparent simplicity and the 
fact we have roof tops everywhere.  Wattenberg says these alternate 
forms of energy are pipe dreams because they cost too much and we 
could blanket the countryside with solars panels or wind turbines and 
will have, at best, a spotty, underwhelming supply of energy.  He, 
interestingly, has solar panels installed at his house!  May it's 
hubris, but if Dr. Bill is right then we are laboring under a false 
sense of safety with respect to the environment when it comes to 
nuclear energy.  Obama's choice of Nobel laureate Steve Chu, a 
nuclear physicist for energy secretary may prove interesting as Chu 
is also interested in energy efficiency and non-food boi fuels.  
Obama says he intends to put science ahead of ideology.  Time will 
tell. Carl Prather 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Life on your PC is safer, easier, and more enjoyable with Windows 
Vista®. 
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/127032870/direct/01/
>


Reply via email to