On Sep 8, 2010, at 2:37 PM, P T Withington wrote:

> On Sep 8, 2010, at 15:52, David Herman <dher...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> 
>> libraries should generally be very widely used and very stable before they 
>> are added to the ES standard library.
> 
> That would seem like an unfair penalty. Am I to infer classes-as-sugar [is] 
> preferred because it _can't_ be implemented as a library (despite being a 
> more experimental approach, and at odds with existing OOP libraries)?

I would not say classes-as-sugar is preferred by everyone on TC39. Waldemar 
favored it over against traits so Mark went back to the wiki salt mine to work 
on it.

Hard to say what will happen here -- possibly something else (object 
initialiser extensions).

/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to