>> I don’t know how problematic this would be, but if "super" is an internal >> property of a function, then it could be updated whenever such a function is >> set as the value of a property. > > No, that doesn't work. Both for cases where the function author really did > mean the proto-object of the literal-induced object surrounding the function, > and in efficiency terms (we do not mutate the RHS of assignment depending on > the LHS's Reference Base, e.g.). > > If you really want to change what super means in a function expressed in an > object initialiser, I'd like to see the exact use-case.
The only use case would be assigning a function that uses "super" to a property. -- Dr. Axel Rauschmayer a...@rauschma.de twitter.com/rauschma home: rauschma.de blog: 2ality.com _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
