>>> If you really want to change what super means in a function expressed in an
>>> object initialiser, I'd like to see the exact use-case.
>>
>> The only use case would be assigning a function that uses "super" to a
>> property.
>
> Such an assignment might need the meaning of super to remain the same,
> though. What's the use-case for remapping it? Stealing methods from one class
> to another whose static super is not the same object as the proto of the
> object into which the stolen function reference is stored?
It wouldn’t be about stealing, but about setting up an object differently:
var obj = {
foo: function (x) {
super.foo(x);
}
};
=== VERSUS ===
var obj = {};
obj.foo = function (x) {
super.foo(x);
};
The <| helps to make that less urgent (I often use Object.create() and then add
properties via assignment, to avoid the verbosity of property descriptors).
--
Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
a...@rauschma.de
twitter.com/rauschma
home: rauschma.de
blog: 2ality.com
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
