I noticed the absence of setter's, getter's. Would this be valid syntax? set health(value) { if (value < 0) { throw new Error("Health must be non-negative."); } @health = value; }
On Nov 3, 2011, at 12:17 AM, Brendan Eich <bren...@mozilla.com> wrote: > What is "super-intuitive" about running 'class C' up against an arbitrary > expression, which is then evaluated and *copied* (details fuzzy here) as the > class prototype? > > Arguments about feelings and intuition are not that helpful. Saying why you > need to construct a class that way, where no such object copying primitive > exists in JS, would be more helpful. IOW, what's the use-case? > > /be > > On Nov 2, 2011, at 11:03 PM, Matthew J Tretter wrote: > >> So to clarify, is the dynamic super issue the whole reason that Jeremy's >> dynamic construction of classes is considered not doable? Because it seems >> to me that super may not be worth that trade off. Besides, Python's super >> implementation requires the hardcoding of the class and that doesn't cause >> much of a stink. If something similar would give us this super-intuitive >> syntax and the ability to build classes from arbitrary object literals, it >> seems like not a big loss. > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss