Ah. Gotcha. Yes, that's a good point. But even though such changes are costly and less needed by ES7, I expect ES7 will nevertheless have some further syntax enhancements that don't work on ES6. The main example is the minimality of min-max classes, These really really need to be made more usable in ES7.
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:28 PM, David Herman <dher...@mozilla.com> wrote: > On Dec 3, 2012, at 6:27 PM, "Mark S. Miller" <erig...@google.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Brandon Benvie >> <bran...@brandonbenvie.com> wrote: >>> I understand that there's limitations on what can be packed into this >>> release and in particular this proposal pushes the limits. But I don't buy >>> the ES7-is-around-the-corner wager for two reasons. >>> >>> The first reason is that I believe it's likely going to be a lot harder to >>> get syntax changes into ES7 than for ES6. ES6 is basically the cruise boat >>> to new syntax and once that boat sets sail it's going to be another decade >>> before anyone wants to screw around with breaking syntax changes. >> >> What are the breaking syntax changes in ES6? > > He's not using the term the way you and I do. :) He means using new syntax > breaks when run on old browsers. > > Dave > -- Cheers, --MarkM _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss