Andreas Rossberg wrote:
On 28 December 2012 11:51, David Bruant <bruan...@gmail.com <mailto:bruan...@gmail.com>> wrote: Le 28/12/2012 11:20, Brendan Eich a écrit : David Bruant wrote: What about a specific section of the spec called "de facto standards"? It would indicate that it's part of the standard, but is a scar from history rather than a legit feature. An intro would explain what this is all about. It would be an interesting middleground between normal spec features (which people take for the Holy Graal) and appendices (which people will skip). __{define|lookup}{G|S}etter__ would fit well in this section. Those never made it into IE. Why include them? There's a bright line drawn by interop. I've seen Node.js code with it. That's a good point, actually. I, for one, do not understand the criteria by which we chose to include __proto__ but not __defineGetter__ and friends.
__defineGetter__ and friends have sane alternative, mutable __proto__ hasn't?
/Andreas
Herby _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
