On 22 March 2013 12:33, Andreas Rossberg <rossb...@google.com> wrote:
> Aren't you confusing "machine readable specification" with "machine > readable syntax specification"? Syntax is only a small part of a > language spec, and quite frankly, the least interesting one by far. > Also, I don't see the benefit of your format. The EcmaScript spec > actually goes to quite some length to give a grammar that is LR(1). > The whole point is to keep it de facto "machine readable". But unlike > yours, it also is human readable. > That was the reason to discuss, I think it could be applied to more than just syntax rules. You don't like it and that's fine with me I just wanted to post my ideas.
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
