On 22 March 2013 12:57, Wes Garland <w...@page.ca> wrote: > Is there a formalized way to translate between the human and > machine-readable specifications? If they are found to have different > meanings (not hard to imagine), which specification would be > considered authoritative?
The human readable form would be generated from the machine readable form. The human form should be a descriptive representation of the actual rules defined by the machine readable form. There should be no confusion only human error in understanding the descriptive text. The machine readable form should be authoritative since the idea is to implement whatever code based on the rules from the machine readable specification. To translate what I wrote in the initial mail into human form would be something like: Function Statement can follow Nothing and then expects Function Statement Identifier to follow. and Function Expression cannot follow Nothing.
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
