Jeremy Darling wrote:
I understand g(un)zip is the de-facto standard, I would just hate to
see such a small detail overlooked at the end of the day when a one
liner pretty much covers it.
Oh, and I'll 2nd the "way nicer than any AMD solution". This also
keeps readability in mind along with forcing declaration instead of
allowing you to loose track of dependencies accidentally. I prefer to
have page bloat in dev form and compile down for production use only
if necessary.
Course, that's two cents from a guy who usually hides in the corners
on this type of discussion.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Andrea Giammarchi
<andrea.giammar...@gmail.com <mailto:andrea.giammar...@gmail.com>> wrote:
You are confining the problem in HTTP only scenarios while the
solution provided by
<script src="lib/main.js" ref=”assets.zip”></script>
No, you're right -- agree with you and Andrea, this is sweet.
HTML nerd nit: is "ref" the right name? I thought it was used as an
attribute name somewhere in HTML or nearby, but I can't find it. Cc'ing
Anne.
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
