On 11/10/2013, at 03:10, Andrea Giammarchi wrote: > > > Last personal thought: this is way nicer than any AMD solution I've seen, > giving a real alternative to async modules too via script defer/async > attributes without requiring boiler plates all over to include on demand.
Because all the files in the .zip would appear to be 'local', a synchronous require() can be built on top of that, and suddenly we'd have almost 100% node-style modules compatibility in browsers. Or am I missing something? -- ( Jorge )(); _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
